LesLeigh is an experienced copywriter and content marketer deeply interested in AI and its ability to enhance productivity in various industries, starting with legal tech.
AI-powered transcription sparks strong opinions ranging from excitement to skepticism. Can it match the precision of a professional legal transcriptionist? Will it introduce errors that jeopardize a case? Some fear AI is an all-or-nothing replacement, but that’s not the whole picture.
Legal transcription—also known as verbatim transcription—and general transcription both turn spoken words into written records, but the similarities end there. Legal transcription demands specialized knowledge, strict compliance, and an unwavering commitment to accuracy.
Today, remote court reporting can be a strategic advantage. Technology has permanently changed how cases are managed, from streamlining multi-district litigation to handling high-profile disputes with global participants. Let’s look at some of the landmark cases that paved the way.
This guide spotlights the ten most technology-forward states where legal professionals can confidently conduct remote depositions. Understanding these key jurisdictions will help you leverage remote tools effectively while maintaining compliance.
This guide is designed to help legal teams sidestep the most common remote deposition mistakes, offering practical solutions and insights to elevate the quality of virtual proceedings. Whether you’re a remote deposition veteran or new to the process, there’s always room to refine your approach.
The content on this blog is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
