California’s court reporter shortage is reaching a breaking point. Now, the state’s Supreme Court may decide if audio recordings can fill the gap when no certified reporter is available—marking a potential shift in how justice is documented.
Court reporting has evolved from handwritten shorthand to stenotype machines and AI-assisted transcription. Despite technological changes, the core mission persists: creating precise, reliable records that uphold the integrity of legal proceedings.
AI-powered instant legal transcription transforms depositions into active, searchable intelligence tools. Legal teams can access real-time transcripts, search testimony, flag key moments, and refine strategies on the spot—enhancing case strategy at every stage of litigation.
AI-powered transcription sparks strong opinions ranging from excitement to skepticism. Can it match the precision of a professional legal transcriptionist? Will it introduce errors that jeopardize a case? Some fear AI is an all-or-nothing replacement, but that’s not the whole picture.
Legal transcription—also known as verbatim transcription—and general transcription both turn spoken words into written records, but the similarities end there. Legal transcription demands specialized knowledge, strict compliance, and an unwavering commitment to accuracy.
The content on this blog is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
